Many of the Democrats and liberals crying about the loss of the imperialist Clinton have begun spewing out the claim of Russian interference into the Presidential election. While this may satisfy their distraught minds for a while, it’s complete bogus.
The Washington Post ran it’s first piece claiming that the CIA had found that the Russian were involved in helping the Trump Campaign secure the 270 Electoral Votes needed to win. At this point, this claim is phony at best, but some digging reveals some things that should concern Hillary Clinton, should real investigations actually take place.
The WaPo article opened talking about a CIA assessment, which concluded that the Russians helped the Trump campaign win the 2016 election. It then swiftly moved into how the Russians were involved in leaking DNC emails and other high-level Democratic operatives and more emails to Wikileaks, despite the open rebuttal by Julian Assange saying the source of the leaks is not Russian.
But wait, here we go. They finally mention how the Russians rigged the election. Here’s what happened:
“The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.
For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability.”
So this article is just more complaining about the Wikileaks emails? I read the thing, and it only ever discusses this. It never dives any deeper into the CIA report. It never dives deeper into the possible actions of the Russian Government, or the possibility to hack the election and enough machines to rig it (though the DNC has good knowledge on this already).
All the Washington Post has to offer is more recycled complaints from the Wikileaks emails, as if to bring back a dead horse and beat it some more.
Look, Imma be frank, but the CIA is crap. Liberals and leftists all hated it under Bush. Michael Moore railed against it in his documentaries. But now because of Clinton’s loss, it has to be true when it says the Russians COULD HAVE been involved, even though they have 0 evidence pointing to actual involvement.
But what has my newsfeed been flooded with these past several days? Fake news like the Washington Post article, and a bunch of other MSM news outlets all clamoring to bandwagon on this fake story.
And thus I get more crap news like this:
EVERY AMERICAN should be relieved that electoral officials across the country have determined that the level of voter fraud was negligible in the 137.7 million ballots cast in November. President-elect Donald Trump’s claim of millions of fraudulent votes is simply not true. But every American should be deeply concerned about evidence that Russia attempted to use computer hacking, fake news stories and perhaps other methods to undermine the integrity of the U.S. campaign and, specifically, to defeat Hillary Clinton. Congress should establish a bipartisan, select committee to investigate.
You see though, there’s one problem with all of this garbage: the Russians haven’t damaged the integrity of the elections process. You know who has though. People like Hillary Clinton, who think that it’s their turn for the highest office. For years, vote rigging and elections fraud have been found, more often favoring Democrat candidates. Yet that doesn’t harm an election as much as a fake WorldNewsDaily or USA24 or YourNewsWire story.
The 2016 election wasn’t rigged by the Russians. The left is upset over their loss, and is looking for any way to blame it on anyone but themselves. In the process, they’re willing to sacrifice reason, sound logic, journalism, freedom, and perhaps start a war with Russia just because they can’t handle the fact that the woman who actually was open to war with Russia back in the campaign lost. Yet these people are pro-peace and supposed to be “enlightened” and all that crap from their college degrees. It’s bullshit is what it is.